Upload a deposition transcript and get the facts and legal issues extracted, each cited to the page and line it came from. Read what the witness actually committed to, find the testimony that matters, and check it against the transcript before you rely on it.
Deposition summary software reads a deposition transcript and produces a structured summary of the testimony, with a citation back to the page and line where each point appears. Instead of reading three hundred pages to find the four answers that matter, you start from the extracted facts and issues and open the transcript at the exact line to confirm what the witness said. The software does the reading pass. The judgment about what the testimony means stays with you.
A page-by-page digest tells you what happened in the order it was asked, which is rarely the order you need it. A witness may touch the same subject on page 41, page 118, and page 260. Case Clarity pulls the legal issues out of the transcript alongside the facts, and links each fact to the issue it bears on, so you can follow one subject through the testimony instead of rebuilding it from a page-order read.
A deposition summary you cannot verify is a liability. Every entry Case Clarity produces carries the page and line reference it came from, so you can open the transcript and read the question and answer in full before quoting it in a brief. Nothing is paraphrased beyond recognition, and nothing arrives without a citation you can check.
Most cases turn on where accounts diverge. Ask the same question across every deposition in the matter and read the answers side by side: who placed the event at 8:55, who said everything seemed normal, who was never asked. Conflicts and gaps in coverage become visible in a single view instead of emerging three transcripts later.
Not every deposition arrives as a clean transcript. Case Clarity transcribes video and audio — video depositions, recorded interviews, examinations under oath — and analyzes the resulting transcript the same way, keeping the recording timestamp on the entry so you can jump to the moment rather than scrubbing for it.
The legal questions the testimony speaks to, with the facts that bear on each one.
Each extracted fact carries a note on why it matters and how strong the support is.
Places the testimony conflicts with itself, another witness, or a document.
Times and dates the witness fixed on the record, ready for the chronology.
Subjects left open or never asked, kept as a list for the next deposition.
Verbatim testimony worth quoting, with the citation already attached.
The same transcript serves different jobs depending on who is reading it.
Get through the transcript in an evening instead of a weekend, then spend the time on the four answers that decide the motion. Every point you quote already carries the citation a brief needs.
Produce the first-pass digest the attorney asked for without spending three days on it. Review and correct a draft that already has the citations in place rather than building one from a blank page.
Keep every transcript in the matter summarized the same way, so the team compares testimony rather than comparing formats. New transcripts fold into the existing record as they arrive.
Deposition summary software reads a deposition transcript and produces a structured summary of the testimony, citing the place in the record each point came from. It replaces the manual read-and-digest pass, not the attorney's judgment about what the testimony means for the case.
AI is reliable at the mechanical part — reading every page, extracting the facts and issues, and recording where each one appears — and unreliable as a final authority on what testimony means. That is why every entry Case Clarity produces carries its page and line cite: the summary is a draft you verify against the transcript, and anything you intend to quote in a filing should be read in full first.
Manually, a common rule of thumb is roughly an hour of summarizing for every hour of testimony, so a full-day deposition is most of a working day. Software shortens the reading pass to minutes and moves your time to reviewing the draft, correcting characterizations, and deciding what matters.
By issue, in most litigation work. A page-order digest is easier to produce and harder to use, because a witness returns to the same subject at unrelated points in the transcript. Grouping by issue puts everything the witness said about notice, or timing, or causation together, with each page and line cite preserved. Keep a page-order index alongside it when you need to navigate the transcript itself.
Yes. Case Clarity transcribes video and audio depositions and analyzes the resulting transcript the same way it handles a written one, keeping the recording timestamp on each entry so you can jump to the moment instead of scrubbing through the file.
Exhibit numbers mentioned in the testimony are captured with the entry that discusses them, so a summary of what a witness said about an exhibit points at both the transcript page and the exhibit under discussion.
Summaries, facts, and timeline entries point back to the page, exhibit, or timestamp they came from.
Case Clarity helps prepare summaries, chronologies, and first drafts you can verify and refine.
The software supports your review. Strategy, judgment, and final decisions remain with your team.
Upload a transcript and review the summary Case Clarity produces, with a page and line cite on every entry. Start free for 7 days.
Source-linked by design. Verify against the source.