Case Clarity helps turn reviewed case materials into structured starting points for your review, including deposition summaries, case briefs, chronologies, outlines, and other draft materials.
Once the record is reviewed, prepare a first draft from it: a deposition summary, a case brief, a fact section, a chronology, an issue outline. Structured sections, drafted from the facts you verified, with the citation on each point.
Every draft is clearly marked for review. Nothing is presented as a finished filing, and nothing leaves your desk without your judgment on it. You revise, verify, and decide.
Key testimony, admissions, and contradictions, each with a citation.
A structured brief, fact section, or issue outline drafted from the case materials.
A dated chronology ready to drop into your work product.
Legal drafting software produces a first draft of a document from information you supply, so the work starts from a structured draft instead of a blank page or a stale precedent. It is a drafting aid: the attorney reviews, corrects, and takes responsibility for what is filed or sent.
Litigation work product such as case briefs, legal memoranda, chronologies, discovery request templates, affidavits, subpoenas, motions, and letters to clients or opposing counsel; transactional documents such as NDAs, employment and consulting agreements, settlement agreements, and software licences; and firm administration documents such as engagement letters, fee agreements, and client intake forms.
Yes, and that is the point of drafting inside the matter rather than in a separate tool. A brief or fact section drafted from documents you have already uploaded and reviewed carries source notes back to those materials, so each assertion can be checked against the record it came from.
No. Treat every draft as a starting point that needs review against the governing law, the court's local rules, and the facts of the matter. Jurisdiction-specific requirements, formatting rules, and the judgment about what to argue remain the attorney's responsibility.
Yes, in the sense the term normally carries: the document is assembled from the parameters and materials you supply rather than typed from scratch each time. What it does not do is run a rules engine over a firm-approved clause library, which is what some document automation products mean. Treat the output as a draft to review, not an approved precedent.
It complements one. A precedent library gives you a document your firm has already vetted; drafting software gives you a first pass when no suitable precedent exists or when the precedent would need heavy rewriting to fit the matter.
Summaries, facts, and timeline entries point back to the page, exhibit, or timestamp they came from.
Case Clarity helps prepare summaries, chronologies, and first drafts you can verify and refine.
The software supports your review. Strategy, judgment, and final decisions remain with your team.
Review a deposition and generate a summary you can edit, with sources noted on each point. Start free for 7 days.
Source-linked by design. Verify against the source.